Article Details

  1. Home
  2. Article Details
image description

PDF

Published

2024-01-15

How to cite

Das, S., Banerjee, H., 2024. Estimation of carbon footprint in direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa) under rainfed medium land situation. Innovative Farming 9(1), 01-09.

Issue

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Innovative Farming

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

HOME / ARCHIVES / Vol. 9 No. 1 : January-March (2024) / Research Articles

Estimation of Carbon Footprint in Direct Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa) under Rainfed Medium Land Situation

Susmita Das*

Dept. of Agronomy, Sri Sri University, Cuttack, Odisha (795 004), India

Hirak Banerjee

Dept. of Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, West Bengal (741 252), India

DOI: NIL

Keywords: Carbon footprint, Direct seeded rice, Greenhouse gas, Seed rate, Sowing techniques

Abstract


An experiment was conducted for two consecutive years, 2018 and 2019 during the kharif season on direct seeded rice in the experimental farm of the Central Agricultural University, Imphal. The experimental site is located under the eastern Himalayan region (II). The study was conducted to investigate into the carbon footprint of direct seeded rice under rain fed medium land situation. The study was based on factorial randomized block design (FRBD) comprising of two factors, sowing techniques and seed rate. Broadcasting and line sowing were the levels under sowing techniques and seed rate has five levels including 80 kg ha-1, 90 kg ha-1, 100 kg ha-1, 110 kg ha-1 and 120 kg ha-1, respectively. The total estimated greenhouse gas emission in line sowing method (11.02% was at par with broadcasting method (11.06%) with 120 kg ha-1 of seed rate followed in both the methods. Line sowing with 100 kg ha-1 resulted in highest carbon output. Further, line sowing with 80 kg ha-1 was superior in terms of parameters like carbon efficiency, carbon sustainability index and carbon efficiency ratio.

Downloads


not found

Reference


Ahmad, S., Li, C., Dai, G., Zhan, M., Wang, J., Pan, S., Cao, C., 2009. Greenhouse gas emission from direct seeding paddy field under different rice tillage systems in central China. Soil and Tillage Research 106(1), 54-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.09.005.

Ashoka, P., Meena, R.S., Gogoi, N., Kumar, S., Yadav, G.S., Layek, J., 2017. Green nanotechnology is a key for eco-friendly agriculture. Journal of Clean Production 142(Part 4), 4440-4441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.117.

Chaudhary, V.P., Singh, K.K., Pratibha, G., Bhattacharyya, R., Shamim, M., Srinivas, I., Patel, A., 2017. Energy conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation under different production systems in rice cultivation. Energy 130, 307-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.131.

Conrad, R., Mitra, A.P., Neue, H.U., Sass, R., 1996. Methane emissions from rice cultivation. In: Revised IPCC Guidelines for rational greenhouse gas inventories: Reference Manual, Volume 3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). pp. 4.53-4.71.

Deng, J.L., 1982. Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters 1(5), 288-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X.

Dyer, J.A., Desjardins, R.L., 2003. Simulated farm fieldwork, energy consumption and related greenhouse gas emissions in Canada. Biosystems Engineering 85(4), 503-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00072-2.

FAO, 2017. The State of Food and Agriculture, Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

FAO, 2020. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020-2029. OECD Publishing, Paris/ Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome. p. 330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/1112c23b-en.

Gathorne-Hardy, A., 2016. The sustainability of changes in agricultural technology: The carbon, economic and labor implications of mechanization and synthetic fertilizer use. Ambio 45, 885-894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0786-5.

Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A., 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agriculture Research. 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons Publishers, New York. pp. 357-423.

Harrison-Kirk, T., Beare, M.H., Meenken, E.D., Condron, L.M., 2013. Soil organic matter and texture affect responses to dry/wet cycles: Effects on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 57, 43-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.008.

IPCC, 1996. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, and Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Khalil, K., Mary, B., Renault, P. 2004. Nitrous oxide production by nitrification and denitrification in soil aggregates as affected by O2 concentration. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36(4), 687-699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.01.004.

Lal, R., 2004. Carbon emissions from farm operations. Environment International 30(7), 981-990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.005.

Pandey, D., Agrawal, M., 2014. Carbon footprint estimation in the agriculture sector. In: Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors, Volume 1. EcoProduction. Springer, Singapore. pp. 25-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-41-2_2.

Parashar, D.C., Mitra, A.P., Gupta, P.K., Rai, J., Sharma, R.C., Singh, N., Koul, S., Ray, H.S., Das, S.N., Parida, K.M., Rao, S.B., Kanungo, S.P., Ramasami, T., Nair, B.U., Swamy, M., Singh, G., Gupta, S.K., Singh, A.R., Saikia, B.K., Batua, A.K.S., Pathak, M.G., Iyer, C.S.P., Gopalakrishnan, M., Sane, P.V., Singh, S.N., Banerjee, R., Sethunathan, N., Adhya, T.K., Rao, V.R., Palit, P., Saha, A.K., Purkait, N.N., Chaturvedi, G.S., Sen, S.P., Sen, M., Sarkar, B., Banik, A., Subbaraya, B.H., Lal, S., Venkatramani, S., Lal, G., Chaudhary, A., Sinha, S.K., 1996. Methane budget from paddy fields in India. Chemosphere 33(4), 737-757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(96)00223-8.

Pathak, H., Wassmann, R., 2007. Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture: I. Generation of technical coefficients. Agricultural Systems 94(3), 807-825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.11.015.

Pathak, H., Saharawat, Y.S., Gathala, M., Ladha, J.K., 2011. Impact of resource-conserving technologies on productivity and greenhouse gas emission in rice-wheat system. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 1(3), 261-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.27.

Pathak, H., 2015. Greenhouse gas emission from Indian agriculture: Trends, drivers and mitigation strategies. Proceedings in Indian National Science Academy 81(5), 1133-1149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2015/v81i5/48333.

Pratibha, G., Srinivas, I., Rao, K.V., Shanker, A.K., Raju, B.M.K., Choudhary, D.K., Rao, K.S., Srinivasarao, C., Maheswari, M., 2016. Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity of conventional and conservation agriculture system in rainfed semi-arid tropics of India. Atmospheric Environment 145, 239-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.039.

Tabatabaie, S.M.H., Rafiee, S., Keyhani, A., 2012. Energy consumption flow and econometric models of two plum cultivars productions in Tehran Province of Iran. Energy 44(1), 211-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.036.

Tjandra, T.B., Ng, R., Yeo, Z., Song, B., 2016. Framework and methods to quantify carbon footprint based on an office environment in Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production 112(Part 5), 4183-4195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.067.

Tubiello, F.N., Condor-Golec, R.D., Salvatore, M., Piersante, A., Federici, S., Ferrara, A., Rossi, S., Flammini, A., Cardenas, P., Biancalani, R., Jacobs, H., Prasula, P., Prosperi, P., 2014. Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agriculture: A Manual to Address Data Requirements for Developing Countries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. p. 181.

Vetter, S.H., Sapkota, T.B., Hillier, J., Stirling, C.M., Macdiarmid, J.I., Aleksandrowicz, L., Green, R., Joy, E.J.M., Dangour, A.D., Smitha, P., 2017. Greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural food production to supply Indian diets: Implications for climate change mitigation. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 237, 234-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.024.

Wang, C., Lai, D.Y.F., Sardans, J., Wang, W., Zeng, C., Penuelas, J., 2017. Factors related with CH4 and N2O emissions from a paddy field: clues for management implications. PLoS ONE 12(1), e0169254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169254.

Wassmann, R., Neue, H.U., Ladha, J.K., Aulakh, M.S., 2004. Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from rice-wheat cropping systems in Asia. Environment, Development and Sustainability 6, 65-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ENVI.0000003630.54494.a7.

Yadav, G.S., Lal, R., Meena, R.S., Datta, M., Babu, S., Das, A., Layek, J., Saha, P., 2017. Energy budgeting for designing sustainable and environmentally clean/safer cropping systems for rainfed rice fallow lands in India. Journal of Cleaner Production 158, 29-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.170.

Yadav, G.S., Das, A., Lal, R., Babu, S., Meena, R.S., Saha, P., Singh, R., Datta, M., 2018. Energy budget and carbon footprint in a no-till and mulch based rice-mustard cropping system. Journal of Cleaner Production 191, 144-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.173.