Article Details

  1. Home
  2. Article Details
image description

PDF

Published

2021-05-16

How to cite

Nair, A.S., Durga, C., 2021. Impacts of Lightening on Agriculture and Its Remediation. Biotica Research Today 3(5), 327-329.

Issue

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Biotica Research Today

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

HOME / ARCHIVES / Vol. 3 No. 5 : May (2021) / Popular Article

Impacts of Lightening on Agriculture and Its Remediation

Aswathy S. Nair*

State Emergency Operation Centre, Kerala State Disaster Management Authority, Kerala (695 033), India

Durga C.

Dept. of Agronomy, Kerala Agriculture University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala (680 656), India

DOI: NIL

Keywords: Agriculture, Disaster, Lightening injury, Nitrogen fixation

Abstract


Lightening is one of the naturally occurring devastating disaster causing dreadful effects in all sectors. Considering the frequency of occurrence and impact, Kerala declared lightening as a state disaster. Lightening causes death fatalities as well losses in agriculture sector. Lightening causes pull up of palm trees and premature fruit drop or deflation in other crops. The main challenge posed by lighting injury is to diagnosis the problem correctly. At the same time lightening benefits soil by adding atmospheric nitrogen. Earth Networks contributes to national, state and municipal efforts to minimize lightning injuries and damage by deploying and operating total lightning detection networks. Other than this, farmers need to take precautionary actions based on bulletins published by concerned authority.

Downloads


not found

Reference


Murli Das S., Sampath, S., Mohankumar, G., 2007. “Lightning hazard in Kerla”. J. Marine Atmos. Res. 3, 111–117.

Shearman, K, M., Ojala, C, F., 1999. “Some causes for lightning data inaccuracies: the case of Michigan”. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80, 1883–1891.

Tinmaker, MR., Chate, D, M., 2013. “Lightning activity over India: a study of east–west contrast”. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34, 5641–5650.